Litter or life-giving?

Is leaving water bottles for migrants in the desert litter or a Christian act of mercy?  According to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, the answer is “ambiguous.”

Nevertheless, they voted 2-1 to overturn the conviction of a volunteer who left water jugs for migrants in a federal refuge.  The court ruled that it was “ambiguous as to whether purified water in a sealed bottle intended for human consumption meets the definition of ‘garbage.’ ”

The Fish and Wildlife Service maintains that the jugs are litter and continues to prohibit them on the lands it maintains.

Daniel Millis, one of those cited for littering, has a different perspective:

As for spoiling the environment, he said he collected as many jugs as he left behind. He also recounts how he found the dead body of a 14-year-old Salvadoran girl near the refuge days before he was ticketed.

“People are part of the environment,” he said.

Read more from the New York Times

border fence resources | immigration resources

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s